"能源護罩"為何有益於我?
延長機組設備的壽命
由於您的設備現在運轉更短的時期- 像當它是新的-且更好被潤滑作用,它長期將持續。這意味著較少資本支出和貶值費用,因它更能延長機組設備的壽命
、提昇更好的性能和更低的維修費用。
結局
"能源護罩"將減少您冷凍設備的能源消耗有10% 到30%或更多, 根據您的系統機齡和使用狀況。在安裝後大多數的節省將立刻發生,在二個星期內充分地發揮效率。
成本費用
安裝費用平均在12 到18個月運轉回收。 總之,設備3年機齡或更舊表示可選擇安裝"能源護罩"。"能源護罩" 當中一個好處在老舊設備,有更大在節能潛力。
根據FEMP美國能源部門的國家能源管理計畫...
FEMP 報告"能源護罩"的添加方法;在設施測試過可導致以下:
減少的營業成本
延長的容量
減少運行時間
減少的機械摩擦
延長設備的壽命
更安靜的操作
費用怎麼樣 ?
最有效的方式回答這個問題是由"回收投資" 因為費用由設備類型和它的大小來確定。
漂亮的這個產品真實地反映在老舊的設備和更大停滯油薄膜累積的老舊的設備,因這更有效。 回收投資預期一般運轉為3 個到24個月。 雖然在新設備不會瞬時在用電費用體會到節能、但它能延長設備的壽命和降低維護費用節省成本支出 ;對您的系統安裝"能源護罩"是一種非常明智的投資。
Q、"能源護罩"被使用在哪裡
A、"能源護罩"能被使用在實際上冷卻的任一種設備。 且在熱泵裡有效的。 它可被使用在氨和離心式冰水機, 和在制冰機裡非常有效的。
Q、有是任何負面性效果嗎?
A、在過去所有歲月中這個產品被測試並使用,未經歷過設備故障。
FEMP 報告引述從Carrier 的一封信件已經安裝的公司對一位製造商,日期為1989 年3月,陳述",直到目前, Carrier知道從來沒有"能源護罩"的負面性效果。
在Carrier壓縮機的可靠性。" FEMP 報告陳述, "然而,Carrier公司闡明, Carrier公司無法負責對任何添加劑安裝後果;作為添加他們的壓縮機保證負責。"
值得注意的是, Magnusson-Moss消費者保單法案;1992 年規定"製造商不能使保單保固無效;除非第三公信力單位證明添加"能源護罩"導致對設備害處;除非設備製造商可提出證據顯示,潤滑劑導致了對設備害處。"
"能源護罩" Compress Shield™公司
對任何系統。公司充分附加產品責任保險包括由添加"能源護罩"造成對任何系統。所有問題的可能性; 這個保險責任範圍應要求證明是可利用的。
Q."能源護罩"可安全的使用在我的空調設備嗎??
A.當然!
"減少摩擦損耗80%"
"增加金屬抗氧化作用(鐵鏽) 78%"
"減少油封老化28%-81%"
"增加一般冷凍油的潤滑能力1500%" (15倍)
" Magnusson-Moss消費者保單法案在1992年被提出,製造商不能免除保單無效。除非第三公信力單位或製造商可證明添加的產品, 潤滑產品"危害了設備"。
美國政府- F.E.M.P報告

Q、 "能源護罩"的用途?
A、恢復HFC系統失去的容量... 且 "能源護罩"必要的 ;
在HFC系統達到可接受的摻混性"
ASHRAE 報告。
CS PROA
How do I benefit?
Extending equipment life
Because your equipment now runs for shorter periods of time – like it did when it was new – and is better lubricated, it will last longer. This means less capital expenditure and depreciation expense resulting from longer equipment life, better performance and lower maintenance cost.
The payoff
Compress Shield will reduce energy consumption of your cooling equipment by 10% to 30% or more, depending on the age and condition of your system. The bulk of the saving will occur immediately upon installation, with full efficiency occurring within in two weeks.
Cost
The average payback of the installation expense in 12 to 18 operating months. In general, equipment that is 3 years old or older represent candidates for Compress Shield treatment. One of the benefits of Compress Shield is the older the equipment, the greater the potential for savings.
ACCORDING TO FEMP…
The FEMP Report that the addition of Compress Shield™ resulted in the following in the installations tested:
- Reduced operating costs
- Extended capacity
- Reduce run time
- Reduced mechanical friction
- Extended equipment life
- Quieter operation
WHAT ABOUT COSTS?
The most effective way to answer this question is by “return on investment” since the cost is determined by the type of equipment and its size. The beauty of this product is truly in the older equipment and therefore the greater the stagnant oil film buildup, and therefore the better it works. Return on investment has generally run 3 to 18 months. Although the instant savings in electricity cost will not be realized in new equipment, the life-extension and maintenance saving properties to your system makes installing Compress Shield™ a very wise investment.
WHERE CAN COMPRESS SHIELD™ BE USED?
Compress Shield™ can be used in virtually any equipment that cools. It also works extremely well in heat pumps. It can be used in ammonia and centrifugal chillers, and has been extremely effective in ice machines.
ARE THERE ANY NEGATIVES?
In all the years this product has been tested and used, no equipment failures have been experienced.
The FEMP report quotes a letter from the Carrier Corporation to one manufacturer, dated March 1989, which stated, “At this time, Carrier knows of no negative effects (of Compress Shield™) on the reliability of Carrier Compressors.” The FEMP report goes on to state, “However, the Carrier Corporation did state that Carrier cannot be responsible for the behavior of any post-market additives added to their compressors.”
It should be noted that the Magnusson-Moss Consumer Product Warranty Act of 1992 stipulates that “manufacturers may not void a warranty if a third-party lubricant is added unless that equipment manufacturer can demonstrate that the lubricant caused harm to the equipment.”
Compress Shield™, Inc. carries adequate liability insurance to cover the possibility of any problems caused by the addition of Compress Shield™ to any system. A certificate of this insurance coverage is available on request.
Q. Is Compress Shield™ safe to use in my air conditioning equipment?
A. Of course!
- “Reduces friction and wear 80%”
- “Increases metal’s resistance to oxidation (rust) 78%”
- “Reduces seal degradation 28%-81%”
- “Increases conventional refrigerant oil’s ability to lubricate by some 1500%”
- “ The Magnusson-Moss Consumer Product Warranty Act of 1992 provides that the Manufacturers may not void the warranty if a third party product is added unless that the manufacturer can prove that the product "harmed the equipment”.
U.S. Government – F.E.M.P Report
A.“The use of Compress Shield™ restores the lost capacity of HFC systems…and
is necessary in HFC systems to achieve acceptable miscibility”
ASHRAE Report.
請先 登入 以發表留言。