美國航太署STENNIS太空中心在"能源護罩"安裝後；
效率增加16%
設施由・Controls Johnson公司設置
驗證分析由Power Management & Controls, Inc執行
能源消耗能夠在壓縮機從安培讀取值測定的。假設它, 冰水機負載能通過供水和回水水溫來確定。測試進行了七天未安裝"能源護罩" 添加劑；然後安裝"能源護罩" 添加劑十二天的測試。
平均溫度分別是3.087度為基準線；並且2.89度為安裝後期。更高溫度分別在基準線期間，那指示出更高的冰水機負載。但是, 與更高的溫度分別被考慮到,千瓦小時能源消耗是低於百分比依據在安裝期間。
1997年9月17 日到1997年9月28日安裝後資料與1997年9月3日到9月9日基準線資料比較，雖然安裝資料條件相似；但有微高的平均溫度。這資料顯露平均效率改善是13.8% 。
整體平均安裝後資料與平均安裝前資料比較。這資料顯露效率，適當安裝後改進16% 。
就我知識最大能力提出了這個報告資料是準確的。我置外於所有金融也許權益相衝突的單位，以我的責任和我適當的表現兩者都不擁有自己,股票，亦不是被雇用於在可被推薦的產品或設備金融權益的企業。
設施由・Controls Johnson公司設置
由Power Management & Controls, Inc驗證
NASA STENNIS SPACE CENTER
Energy consumption could be determined from the ampreadings on the compressor. It is assumed that the load on
the chiller could be determined by the supply and return
water temperature. Tests were run for seven days without
the Compress Shield™ additive and then for twelve days
with the Compress Shield™ additive. The average
temperature difference was 3.087 degrees for the base line
and 2.89 degrees for the treatment period. The higher
temperature difference during the base line period indicates
a higher load on the chiller at that time. However, even with
the higher temperature difference taken into consideration,
the kilowatt hours of energy consumption was lower on a
percentage basis during the treatment period.
The September 17, 1997 to September 28, 1997 treatment
data was compared to the September 3, 1997 to September
9, 1997 base line data. The conditions were similar although
the treatment data had a slightly higher average
temperature. This data revealed that the average efficiency
improvement was 13.8%.
The overall average treatment data was compared to the
average non-treatment data. This data revealed that the
efficiency, due the treatment, had improved 16%.
The data presented in this report is accurate to the best of my
knowledge. I am free of all financial interest which may conflict
with the proper performance of my duties and I neither own, hold
stock in, nor am I employed by a firm which has a financial interest
in products or equipment which might be recommended.
若無法圖片顯示請參觀CSPROA實際驗證案例相片圖
請先 登入 以發表留言。